Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00110
Original file (PD2013 00110.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME:    CASE: PD1300110
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130514
SEPARATION DATE: 20030310


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PV1/E-1 (19K/Armor Crewman) medically separated for chronic bilateral lower extremity pain, due to left femoral shaft stress fracture and right femoral shaft stress reaction. CI sustained injuries during a physical training run around 8 October 2002, and was placed on 30 days of convalescent leave. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The bilateral lower extremity pain condition characterized as medically unacceptable and was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated chronic bilateral lower extremity pain as unfitting, rated 0% citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 0% disability rating.


CI CONTENTION: was rushed through system and never looked at my back witch has been constant pain since serving and my main complaint that was somehow? on stress fracture


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting chronic lower extremity pain condition is addressed below. No other conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in his application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20030213
VA - Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Bilateral Lower Extremity Pain 5099-5003 0% Left Femoral Stress Fracture 5299-5014 10% STR
Right Femoral Stress Fracture 5299-5014 10% STR
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
Combined: 0%
Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 30315 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s assertions that certain improprieties may have occurred while the Army was processing his case. It is noted for the record that the Board has neither the jurisdiction nor authority to scrutinize or render opinions in regard to suspected Service improprieties. The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB fitness and rating determinations, based on severity at the time of separation.

Bilateral Leg Pain. In October 2002, the CI developed pain in both thighs. A bone scan revealed a stress fracture of the left femoral shaft, and stress reaction of the right femoral shaft. He was treated with conservative measures, including physical therapy and rest. However, the leg pain persisted and an MEB was initiated. Physical examination of the thighs on 10 January 2003 showed no edema (swelling), erythema (redness), ecchymosis (bruising), effusion, or tenderness to palpation. The hips and knees were unremarkable.

The Board carefully reviewed all evidentiary information available. The PEB combined the two leg pain conditions into a single unfitting condition characterized as: “chronic bilateral lower extremity pain, due to left femoral shaft stress fracture and right femoral shaft stress reaction.” The condition was coded 5099-5003, and rated at 0%. The VA unbundled the two leg conditions, and assigned a rating of 10% to each leg, resulting in a combined rating of 20%. The Board evaluated whether or not it was appropriate for the two legs to be “bundled” together. The Board must determine if the PEB’s approach of combining the conditions under a single rating was reasonably justified in lieu of separate ratings. The Board must apply separate codes and ratings in its recommendations if compensable ratings for each condition are achieved IAW the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). However, if the Board judges that two or more separate ratings are warranted, it must satisfy the requirement that each ‘unbundled’ condition was unfitting in and of itself. The key issue therefore was whether a compensable evaluation could be granted for the right (less severe) leg. After due deliberation, the Board determined that the evidence did not support a conclusion that the right leg pain, separately, would have rendered the CI incapable of performing his required military duties; and, accordingly cannot recommend a separate disability rating for right leg pain. It is reasonably justified for the two legs to be bundled together and treated as a single unfitting condition.

The Board directs its attention to the left (worse) leg. Since there was no loss of motion, the leg condition was essentially non-compensable based solely on VASRD §4.71a. However; IAW VASRD §4.40 (functional loss), when part of the musculoskeletal system becomes painful on use, it must be regarded as seriously disabled. After due deliberation, and based on a thorough review of the service treatment record (STR), the Board determined that a disability rating of 10% was warranted. The Board tried to find a path to a higher rating, using other codes which could be applied to the leg pain condition. The other VASRD codes that were considered did not result in a rating higher than 10%, since the STR did not show sufficient evidence of a disabling leg abnormality which would justify a rating higher than 10%. Considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board unanimously recommends a separation disability rating of 10% for the chronic bilateral leg pain. It is appropriately coded 5099-5022 (analogous to periostitis), and IAW VASRD §4.40 and §4.71a, meets criteria for the 10% rating level.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the bilateral lower extremity pain, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5099-5022, IAW VASRD §4.40 and §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic bilateral lower extremity pain 5099-5022 10%
COMBINED
10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120913, w/atchs
Exhib
it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans
’ Affairs Treatment Record





         Physical Disability Board of Review



SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for AR20130012158 (PD201300110)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00728

    Original file (PD-2012-00728.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. Left tibial stress fracture with bilateral femoral stress reactions.” The L3 profile listed “bilateral lower leg stress fractures.” The commander’s statement indicated complaints of leg pains, noted “stress fractures in both lower legs” without improvement following being “sent...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00695

    Original file (PD2012 00695.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “multiple stress reactions/healing stress fractures”as unfitting rated20%,with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions,left cuboid stress fracture, bilateral medial tibial plateau stress fracture and right femoral shaft stress fracture, were determined to be Category II (contributing to unfit condition). Bone scan on 22 August 2001 demonstrated healing stress...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02015

    Original file (PD-2014-02015.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Lower Extremity Stress Reaction w/o Evidence of Fractures5099-50220%Medial Stress Syndrome Tibial Shaft…Right Side52620%20140319Medial Stress...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01355

    Original file (PD-2013-01355.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : ServiceIPEB – Dated 20040107VA* -based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Lower Extremity Stress Fractures/Reaction50220%Left Tibial Stress Fractures5299-526010%STRRight Tibial Stress Fractures5299-526010%STROther x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 0 Combined: 0%Combined: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20040210 (most proximate to the date of separation (DOS)) Bilateral Stress Fractures . When the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00542

    Original file (PD2012 00542.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army PEB – dated 20010925 The PEB combined the two leg pain conditions into a single unfitting condition characterized as: “Chronic leg pain due to bilateral stress fractures.” The condition was coded 5099-5003, and rated at 0%. After due deliberation, the Board determined by majority decision (2:1 vote) that the evidence does not support a conclusion that each of the leg pain conditions, separately, would have rendered the CI unable to perform his required military training.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01511

    Original file (PD-2013-01511.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Right Femoral Shaft Stress Fracture Condition . The diagnoses were listed asright femoral shaft stress fracture; bilateral medial tibial plateau stress reactions; right second metatarsal stress reaction; and bilateral...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02562

    Original file (PD-2013-02562.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic leg pain, due to recurrent bilateral tibial stress fractures”as unfitting, rated 0%, citing application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20020315VA* -Based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Leg Pain, due to Recurrent Bilateral Tibial Stress Fractures5099-50030%Recurrent Bilateral Tibial Stress Fractures5099-500310%STROther x 0 (Not In...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00037

    Original file (PD2013 00037.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic Right Leg Pain Condition .The CI first presented for pain in both lower extremities (BLE) in May 1999, 3 months after accession. Physical Disability Board of Review SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130016373 (PD201300037)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00953

    Original file (PD 2012 00953.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated bilateral anterior knee pain syndrome as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy and recurrent stress fracture of right tibia as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The MEB examiner referred to the exam results documented on the MEB DD Form 2808 which are summarized in the chart above.The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 8 days prior...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01314

    Original file (PD 2012 01314.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON: Service FPEB – Dated 20020205 VA Exam (one day pre-sep) All Effective Date 20020426 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam RUQ Pain 8799-8719 10% Abdominal Adhesions w/ Chronic Abdominal Pain 8799-8719 10% 20020424 Plantar Fasciitis, Heel Spurs with Right Calcaneous Stress Fracture 5099-5022 0% B/L Pes Planus w/ B/L Plantar Fasciitis 5276 10% 20020424 B/L Heel Spurs 5015 10% 20020424 Mild Stress Incontinence Not Unfitting Stress...